直播吧07月15日讯 针对克罗地亚1-2不敌葡萄牙的比赛，克罗地亚足协已正式致函国际足联抗议，克罗地亚媒体《晨报》今日获得了克罗地亚足协信函的完整内容。克罗地亚足协致函国际足联信件全文↓本届世界杯再次展现了足球的全球影响力和普及度，正因如此，我们更有必要坚守这项运动的基本价值观：公平公正、体育精神以及平等适用于所有参赛队伍的足球比赛规则。    "The actual intentions of Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan are inevitably sophisticated," says Dr. Chang Ching, a research fellow from the Taiwan-based Society for Strategic Studies and a lead military expert on the People's Liberation Army and regional security in Taiwan.,"To acquire a historical reputation is the obvious factor identified by many politicians. Delivering political signals to Beijing can also be another reason. Attempting to shape the political developments in Taiwan has been accused by certain political commentators as well. Nonetheless, the Chinese media basically define her maneuver as an 'impulsively sneaky visit,' which is a term generally applied to those people who are defined as politically hostile to the Beijing regime visiting certain territories protested by the People’s Republic of China," Dr. Chang continued.,Pundits have speculated about the possibility of Pelosi visiting Taiwan and China's reaction since April 2022; Beijing has clearly demonstrated its fierce opposition to the high-profile visit. After her tour was canceled in the spring after the House speaker reportedly got COVID-19, the debate got its second wind in July.,Pelosi neither officially confirmed nor denied her intent to visit Taipei. Likewise, the White House tried to distance itself from the Democratic politician's trip to Taiwan, while at the same time arguing that such a tour is by no means "uncommon" and that the US "shouldn’t be intimidated by [China's] rhetoric or... potential actions.",Pelosi Provocation Over Taiwan Leads US, World Into Age of Disorder And Instability: Martin Jacques10:27 GMT,"The worst indication reflected by Pelosi’s visit is the decline of the United States that no American politicians are willing to admit," says the Chinese scholar. "If Washington still keeps sufficient confidence to condition Beijing’s reactions to this issue, President Biden himself and his senior members of the government would not show their reluctance to support Pelosi’s visit. The differences between the executive branch and the legislative branch of the United States government on this visit are so clear to see.",Dr. Chang wonders why Pelosi chose to keep her Taiwan visit secret until the last moment. He notes that the House speaker cited "security concerns" over her travel plan.,"Actually, it is a matter of Pelosi’s integrity and also causing more speculations on the so-called American security commitments to Taiwan," says the scholar. "If the Speaker herself has no full confidence of security during her presence in Taiwan, how can people in Taiwan trust the United States is capable of supportive while Taiwan is in danger?",According to Dr. Chang, China has long been very clear about its "red lines" with regard to Taiwan. Therefore, "certain serious consequences can be expected," he notes, ruling out, however, a "full scale invasion or other form of armed conflict.",The scholar points out that there are many measures available in Beijing's toolbox towards Taiwan for conditioning Taipei’s political maneuvers. What's more, the Taipei leadership is "well aware of how damaging [Pelosi's] visit can be" for the island, he adds.,"What can the possible consequences be? It all depends on how Taipei will react to those measures towards Taiwan," says Dr. Chang. "After all, it is literally an interactive process. It takes two to tango. Whether it will turn into a negative spiral or on the contrary to a positive spiral is not merely decided by Beijing. Taipei’s reactions are also important. Also, Beijing will not only try to condition Taipei like many western media [outlets] expected but also press Washington at the same time. The possibility of any mutual cooperation between Beijing and Washington on any global issues has basically vanished in the near future. The difficulties of reconciliation by these two powers will also increase dramatically.",All the aforementioned negative consequences will be unquestionably associated with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her ill-fated decision to visit Taiwan, according to the scholar.。正是由于几起引发全球强烈反响的争议性事件，涉及裁判、媒体代表、足球专家和广大公众，我们认为有必要致函贵方，以澄清2026年7月2日在多伦多举行的克罗地亚对阵葡萄牙的世界杯1/16决赛中，足球比赛规则和国际足联协议在裁判决策过程中的适用情况。在那场比赛的下半场，克罗地亚有三个进球被取消，均是在越位判定延迟后作出的。此外，经VAR介入后，葡萄牙获得了一个点球并扳平比分，尽管主裁判当时就在球员附近，亲眼看到了争议对抗，并且认为那不足以构成点球。因此，这一情况并不属于“严重漏判”。考虑到这种对抗在禁区内几乎每场比赛都会常规出现，我们同样确信这也不能合理地被视为主裁判的“清晰且明显的错误”。换言之，VAR审查的两项基本标准均未满足，根据VAR规程，VAR既无权也无义务召唤主裁判到场边进行回放审查。

二 | 尤其具有争议的是裁判埃斯科斯在第103分钟取消格瓦迪奥尔进球的决定，理由是马里奥·帕沙利奇越位。

三 | 国际足联的官方声明称：“比赛用球内置的技术记录了马塔诺维奇的触球，这使得裁判能够正确判定越位并取消格瓦迪奥尔的进球。”与此同时，国际足联官网关于越位规则的官方解释中指出：“头发只有在影响球的运动或轨迹时才被视为身体的一部分。这可能只在大量头发接触的情况下才成立，例如头顶的发髻。”因此，目前尚不清楚裁判取消克罗地亚进球的依据，究竟是仅仅因为马塔诺维奇可能用一根发丝碰到了球，还是因为他认定这样的触碰影响了球的运动或轨迹，而这从公开可得的录像中无论如何也无法得出结论。此外，所有可获得的录像均清楚显示，球在经过马塔诺维奇头部旁边后，方向、轨迹、速度或旋转均未发生任何变化。换句话说，他并未触球，因此根本谈不上越位。我们认为，传感器记录到的几乎不可察觉的振动竟然能决定如此重要比赛的胜负，这在根本上是错误的。我们不相信足球、球迷、球员、裁判、我们的运动精神乃至国际足联本身，能从相信技术胜过肉眼可见的事实中获益。

四 | 正如世界各地人们的反应所示，不仅仅是克罗地亚球迷，几乎没有人相信马塔诺维奇碰到了球。当技术试图让公众相信相反的情况时，许多人将这样的判罚称为“公然抢劫”或声称“技术正在毁掉足球”，这是完全可以理解的。这些广泛的负面反应无益于国际足联的声誉，也无助于增强公众对技术创新的信任。这一点尤其成问题，因为我们坚信技术在足球中扮演着重要且受欢迎的角色，但不是以这种方式。整个情况因以下问题而变得更加复杂：如果传感器数据毫无疑问地确认了触球，而VAR团队也无可争议地确定了越位，那么为什么裁判还要被叫到场边查看监视器？在这种情况下，这纯粹是一个事实性决定，VAR有权独立作出裁决。反之，如果裁判确实被叫去查看，他到底查看了什么？哪些具体的画面让他得出马塔诺维奇触球或影响了球运动的结论？此外，可获得的电视画面清楚地显示，通过屏幕底部的数据显示，标记所谓触球的“波峰”出现在球到达据称触球的克罗地亚进攻球员之前很久。这样的画面根本不能被视为做出如此重要决定的足够可靠证据。因此，我们请求国际足联向克罗地亚足协提供相应的VAR室录像，以便我们能够确定为何那个“波峰”出现在球甚至还未接近马塔诺维奇的时候。我们完全清楚，对这些事件的任何事后解释都无法改变对阵葡萄牙队的比赛结果。我们尊重葡萄牙队，并祝贺他们晋级十六强。然而，鉴于足球比赛，尤其是世界杯，受到全球数十亿人充满激情与情感的关注，我们认为有必要进一步加强人们对裁判工作的信任，特别是在现代技术的应用标准和方法方面，以防止技术被错误应用或违背其初衷。本场比赛中发生的一切，尤其是最终的越位判罚，引起了全世界球迷的极大不满，这损害了本届历史性世界杯期间的足球运动。因此，我们认为国际足联应当对本场比赛的所有争议情况进行彻底分析，并对直接影响这场结果的裁判判罚提供完整解释。虽然这样的解释无法让克罗地亚国家队在莫德里奇非凡的国家队生涯中再有一次机会在世界最大舞台上争取伟大成就，但我们真诚希望，通过更清晰的规程和改进的程序，未来能够防止类似的不公正且本质上非足球化的判罚，在这种判罚中，传感器变得比肉眼可见的事实更重要。遗憾的是，此类判罚在球迷中引发了巨大失望，从球场上的克罗地亚球迷到全世界的足球爱好者、媒体代表、评论员和广大公众。我们坚信这类情况在未来是可以避免的，正是基于此，我们决定以此方式致信贵方，尽管我们完全清楚，任何解释都无法减轻我们球员和球迷的泪水、悲伤与失望。鉴于上述所有情况，我们恭敬地请求贵方认真考虑我们所提出的问题和建议。我们将拭目以待国际足联是否会作出回应，而对克罗地亚未来的判罚如何，对我们来说更为重要。